Apology not accepted
Wednesday, 24 February 2010 11:42
So, let me get this straight (no pun intended). We aren’t allowed to serve openly in the military. We aren’t allowed to get married almost anywhere. And, in the few places where we are allowed to marry each other, there are people constantly at work to change things back to the discriminating way they were. Is that correct? That’s messed up.
New Hampshire state Rep. Nancy Elliott has been apologizing for the comments she made about gay sex a few weeks ago. She made these offensive remarks during a conference looking into repealing the law that made gay-marriage legal in the state. Well guess what, Nancy? I don’t forgive you! You’re still trying to take away my rights, whether you apologize for what you said or not.
I can’t imagine what possessed her to share the thought that had obviously just sprung into her head the exact moment she decided to share it. The comment she made was, “We’re talking about taking the penis of one man and putting it in the rectum of another man and wiggling it around in excrement.”
The representative continued, “And you have to think, I’m not sure, would I allow that to be done to me? All of us, that could happen to you. Would you let that happen to you?”
Now, I must admit that before I even had the chance to be offended I first let out a healthy laugh at her stupidity. Any idiot would have at least said it quietly in her head before making such an ass of herself on camera. Oh yeah, it’s on tape. Youtube it!
Eliott brought up the topic because she said she was concerned about fifth-graders at a Nashua, N.H., school being taught about anal sex. Of course, that never happened. When Nashua officials called her out for lying in her testimony before the Legislature, she issued a lame apology. She claimed that she believed her statement was true when she made it.
Elliott was quoted in her apology as saying, “I will try much harder in the future to verify fully my statement.” I wonder, if she had fully verified her statement the first time around what would it have sounded like? Perhaps something like, “I’m personally not turned on by the idea of butt-sex and that’s why I don’t think gay people should get married.”
Sorry, Elliott, but no one asked you. There was never any reason for you to bring up anal intercourse at any point in that topic of discussion, unless of course the topic of anal-sex is the root reason why conservatives have a problem with gay people. The cat is out of the bag! It has nothing to do with God hating gay people. It has everything to do with sex.
Well I’ve got news for you, Nancy: Anal sex is not restricted to the gay community. It’s everywhere. It’s all around you. In fact, at the part where she started to ask, “Would you let that happen to you?” the woman to her left tilted her head downward, as if she had something to hide.
Stay Connected